The swooping: you and your team have done the hard work. You’ve made all the big decisions and have a clear project plan, maybe even developed with input from the seagull. Everything appears to be on track until just before the deadline, when the seagull’s questions start pouring in, casting doubt on the validity of the entire approach.
The nesting - the seagull gets involved in all sorts of minor decisions - irrespective of the fact they lack operational context. This often becomes a negative spiral, causing teams to depend on the seagull for sign off, which reinforces their idea that they need to be involved in minutiae rather than focusing on the bigger picture.
The fowl play - seagulls are open about the fact they have high expectations. They just won’t necessarily tell you what they are. But you’ll definitely know when you’ve not met them.
The squawking - seagulls interventionist behaviour often discourages risk-taking and sharing ideas. But so does their wrath when something doesn’t work. They are prone to playing the blame game and their emotive critique can make even inconsequential errors feel huge.
The preening - seagulls are prone to making ‘jokes’ about how they can do everyone’s job, but better. Whilst, in fairness, some leaders probably have tried their hand at a fair few different disciplines at some point - this questionable humour only serves to undermine trust and the authority of the specialist team members that they’ve hired.
The migrating - whilst seagulls are quick to jump in when there’s a fire to put out, they’re not generally hands on people managers who take the time to invest in team members development. Not only is the lack of consistency confusing, their intermittent involvement also often undermines the authority of team leads lower down the pecking order.
- If you recognise some - or all - of these signs, despite the painfully extended metaphor, then it’s important to take action to mitigate the troubling impact a seagull can have on the culture.